(I am changing the title of these posts, as the original one seemed to convey something else than what I wanted to express, though I am not sure if this one is much better).
I think discrimination is nothing
but bias exaggerated, and it may be difficult to define a boundary between the
two. At times, the discrimination can be stark and direct, and there are laws
to deal with it, though the effectiveness of these laws has always been a
question. But most often, it is subtler - indirect hints that keep affirming
that despite your competence, you will never be considered at par with your
male colleagues, that you will never be one of the team. Let me share two
incidents, which are work-related, but not entirely professional, which go on
to show the inherent behavioral insensitivity towards women.
The global head of the group my
friend K works for, came to her site for a visit, and the site manager invited
all his managers for dinner with him. That is, all the managers except K, who,
being the only woman in the group, was conveniently forgotten. Only when they
reached the restaurant, the site manager was reminded of his omission. He
called up K (even apologized!), but by then it was too late for her to make
suitable arrangements for her family and reach there.
Another time, my group planned a
day outing to celebrate a major release. The fun activities planned for the
group consisted of rather physical games of football and cricket – which the
few ladies in the team just watched on, feeling left-out, and somehow,
betrayed.
Most of the corporates today deny
having a glass ceiling for women, but practically, is it difficult to detect
its existence? Though this was not the idea behind this set of posts, it was
perhaps inevitable that we touch upon this point as well (Perhaps because the
initial title was not very apt). Anyway, I had a long discussion on this with
N, but he does not agree with me here. But in my view, though the gender ratio
at the entry level is same as that in engineering colleges, it gets more and
more skewed as the levels increase.
In my decade long stint in my
previous company, in the India office I saw only one woman who was a Director
(though in a non-product group), and none who was an Architect. [Just to
explain the terminology used there, a Director is the owner of a product or an
area from management perspective, while Architect is the owner from technical
perspective]. I am citing here the experience from my previous company, as I am
rather new in the new one to comment, but I strongly suspect that the things
are more or less the same.
So, almost all the senior
executives in the company were male. And rare few of them had working wives.
Most of the wives quit working after marriage/kids, to take care of the
household, since the high-flying executives were often busy and/or away on
business, gearing up the power ladder, and could not be depended on to consistently
attend to domestic responsibilities. I’m sure all these ladies are happy and
proud of their spouses’ success, and only sometimes do they wistfully mention
their own abandoned dreams. But how many of them have their contribution to
this success acknowledged? Mostly, it is just shrugged as a matter-of-fact – “Oh.
She quit after we got married”. A gallant way indeed to thank the ladies for
their support, sacrifice and hard work.
Here are: